The City of the Future
How leaders can create an inspiring, compelling, and credible vision
Traveling along Italy's Tuscany coast, through Poland's countryside, or across the emerging skyline of Doha, it soon becomes clear that no two cities are alike. In fact, every city has different objectives to fulfill, and a wide range of strategic options available to achieve them.
A.T. Kearney's Global Cities Index—which measures the degree of openness, relevance, and global integration of cities around the world—underscores how cities are addressing the wave of globalization that has swept the world.1 City leaders, however, have many objectives, some far more pressing than globalization. Number one is to be a successful leader of a successful city and, thus, get reelected.
Yet whatever the goals, achieving them requires a vision for the future—one that is inspiring, compelling, and credible. When outlining such a vision, city leaders face two distinct but interconnected goals: to protect and improve their citizens' well-being, and to become attractive to the external resources that are so vital for long-term growth (see figure 1). How to make this two-pronged vision a reality?
From Past to Future
The people who participate in the day-to-day life of a city—including residents, commuters, business visitors, and tourists—express different needs and desires. These range from basic needs such as housing, security, and mobility to more abstract ones such as professional development, culture, and social integration and interaction. Different groups of people use city resources differently while making their own distinct contributions. The ability to understand and articulate these differences is central to developing a solid vision for the future.
At the same time, a city must also be attractive externally. In a world of increasing mobility and delocalized resources, people, capital, and information circulate freely and easily across borders and relocate when conditions seem better elsewhere. That's why a city must "put on its best dress" to attract and retain critical outside resources—financial, human, and cultural—that usher in future development. Cities, therefore, must meet the needs of highly mobile constituencies that may or may not yet be in the city, but will not stay if they lack the required conditions. These internal and external needs aren't necessarily opposing—in fact, they are largely interconnected. Solid performance in areas such as transportation, culture, education, administration, and communication will enrich the city economically, culturally, and technologically—making current residents happy while also creating an environment attractive to external resources.
How are cities tackling these dual objectives? We examined a few success stories and found several cities with common challenges (industrial decline, a need for an economic boost) and particular traits to forge unique visions of the future (see figure 2). For example, Birmingham, England's second largest city with a rich tradition, faced a declining manufacturing base and an influx of immigrants. The city's vision for the future included seeking new sources of economic growth while improving multicultural inclusion. Bilbao, Spain, overcame an industrial decline by seeking a new, modern perspective on its years of history—by becoming a city where "dreams come true." The vision of Ljubljana, Slovenia, combined its access to resources with its relatively small size (see sidebar: Ljubljana: Everything Within Reach).
When outlining a vision for the future, city leaders must balance their citizens' well-being with the city's attractiveness to outside resources.
Perhaps the biggest phenomenon in global urbanization in the past decade has been Dubai. The city in the United Arab Emirates sought economic development by attracting foreign capital and people to create a completely new urban society. The foreign population has grown to the extent that today we cannot simply talk about expatriates joining an established national population, but rather a society in which "new" and "old" mix with one another with respect for past culture and diversity (see sidebar: A Vision for Middle East Cities).
A successful vision must create a bridge between a city's past and future. Based on our experience a vision can be articulated around three pillars, which we call the three Cs (see figure 3):
Different Networks, Different Needs
Cities are complex organisms of conflicting needs and issues. A city's vision for the future is merely the ultimate step—the synthesis—of a more articulated process whose main aim is to build a strategic architecture comprising the key policies and projects that city leaders will support, fund, and promulgate to meet their long-term objectives.
A city's vision for the future is the ultimate step of a more articulated process to build a strategic architecture that supports long-term objectives.
Based on our experience, we devised a "strategic map" that helps city leaders articulate their strategic priorities, clarify tradeoffs, and align their strategy and vision. Our map includes two strategic domains, based around four enablers (see figure 4):
Local urban networks. At their core, cities are places and communities—people forging bonds, developing networks of friendship and solidarity, embracing traditions, and creating and nurturing a cultural heritage. These are the ponds where identity factors are developed and why someone born and raised in Milan is different from someone born and raised in Siena. In this domain, cities are conceived as local urban networks, in which economic systems and organizations are connected by local, complementary links. A local urban network may seek to preserve traditions and encourage cultural affinity.
Global economic networks. On the other side of the spectrum, a city's economic systems and organizations are connected on an extra-local or international scale—beyond the concept of place toward the "flow" of financial, human, and information resources across geographical boundaries. Relationships are typically built around economic motives, with decisions about where to live or work based on "society"—more abstract rationales about it being a better place to live and do business. These are a-territorial environments, where rationality informed by economic calculation is the guiding factor of decisions made by people and businesses.
It's easy to see how the future visions for these two networks differ. If a city chooses to become a local urban network, it may seek to invest in more local activities—perhaps festivals, particularly those based around a regional trait such as food or the arts. Selecting a global economic network will mean investing in infrastructure that facilitates global exchange, including airports, roads, and telecom networks.
The enablers of our strategic map focus around security, administration, and social and environmental services. Many of these services are prerequisites that meet the basic needs of the community—assistance for the elderly, ease of access to city functions and services, and recycling and waste management. Importantly, here are the minimum objectives that must be met a priori to satisfy the basic needs of the community. Still, fully formulating the enablers' policies will be influenced by the city's vision and the balance between the two strategic domains.
With their strategic vision in mind, city leaders can move toward making the vision a reality. This starts by prioritizing the most important projects and policies the city has funded in the past three years and will fund in the next three. They are then allocated into the two strategic domains and four enablers to form the city's strategic architecture: the priorities, projects, and policies that fit the context of each city's unique characteristics. The last step is checking the alignment between the priorities of the strategic architecture and the vision of city leaders. Consistency between vision and strategy sets the foundation for effective execution, the critical factor that distinguishes successful leaders of any field.
The Soul of the City
As most cities combine both domains, the key is balancing local and global priorities within the political vision of city leaders. Defining these priorities calls for accepting your city's needs and unique character, and it requires an intimate understanding of the "soul" of your city—a necessity for building a long-lasting foundation for success.
Authors
Luca Rossi is a partner in the Milan office.
Branko Žibret is a partner in the Ljubljana office.
Matthieu De Clercq is a principal in the Middle East office.
1 For more information about the Global Cities Index, go to www.atkearney.com/index.php/Publications/global-cities-index.
|